An Abuja High Court has struck out the criminal charges filed by the Federal Government against the suspended senator representing Kogi Central, Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, bringing an end to a high-profile legal case that generated nationwide debate.
Court documents revealed that the Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) filed a Notice of Discontinuance, prompting the court to formally terminate the criminal defamation and related charges earlier brought against the senator.
The case arose from comments allegedly made by Akpoti-Uduaghan during a televised interview and had drawn significant public attention, particularly over issues of freedom of expression, political accountability, and the limits of prosecutorial authority in a democratic system.
The Notice of Discontinuance, dated December 12, 2025, effectively ended proceedings in suit number FHC/ABJ/CR/195/2025.
Delivering his ruling on Thursday, Justice C. N. Oji acknowledged the withdrawal and struck out the case, noting that the development highlighted the importance of restraint in the exercise of prosecutorial powers.
“The court hopes that this decision will pave the way for restraint, healing, and respect for the rule of law in our democratic process,” the judge said.
Counsel to the Federal Government confirmed in open court that the charges were withdrawn in accordance with the provisions of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, describing the decision as being in the interest of justice and public confidence in the legal system.
Reacting to the ruling, Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan described the outcome as a vindication of her stance.
“Today’s outcome affirms my belief in the rule of law. I remain committed to serving my constituents and defending the democratic rights of all Nigerians,” she said, while thanking her legal team and supporters for their support throughout the proceedings.
The decision follows months of legal controversy and sustained public discourse, with several civil society organisations and human rights groups previously criticising the prosecution as an attempt to suppress free speech and political participation.
